Logan Paul has never been shy about big opinions, and his latest take on money has set social media buzzing. The YouTuber and entrepreneur appeared on Fox Business Network’s The Big Money Show and offered a financial pep talk aimed squarely at Gen Z. Within hours, clips of the segment were spreading fast, along with plenty of disbelief.
Paul’s message was simple in spirit and bold in execution. He argued that young people with some cash should not be afraid to take bigger risks, especially if conventional investing feels uninspiring. Instead of sticking only to traditional choices like the stock market, he suggested exploring unconventional assets that feel meaningful or exciting. He floated examples like collectible trading cards, art, sports memorabilia, and even a piece of a dinosaur.
That advice immediately split the internet into camps. Some viewers said encouraging risk without grounding it in basics can be dangerous, especially for people who are just starting to earn and budget. Others felt the point was less about gambling and more about using youth as a time to experiment, learn, and build conviction. On X, the pushback was sharp, with commenters noting that many young adults are trying to cover rent and groceries, not hunting rare collectibles.
A big reason the conversation caught fire was Paul himself, and what he chose to wear while giving the advice. During the appearance, he had his most famous purchase around his neck, a PSA 10 Pikachu Illustrator Pokémon card valued at a record 5.3 million dollars. The card was set into a diamond necklace that reportedly cost 75,000 dollars, turning his point about alternative assets into a literal statement piece. Paul even joked that someone gave him too much money as an adult, and his childhood love of the game turned into a very expensive obsession.
He also defended his strategy with a claim that Pokémon, as an asset category, has outperformed the stock market by more than 3,000 percent over the past 20 years. He described the brand as the most popular franchise in the world and framed his approach as buying the best of the best. Supporters used that as proof that rare cards can hold serious value, and that being early to a niche market can pay off. Critics countered that speculation is not the same as investing, and that most young people do not have the financial cushion to gamble on high-end collectibles.
What do you think, is Paul’s approach a smart reminder to think beyond the usual, or an out-of-touch flex dressed up as advice? Share your take in the comments.
