Not every question is a good question, and some habits we carry into everyday conversation do more harm than good. When silence creeps in during an interaction, the instinct for many people is to reach for the most familiar opener available, often without stopping to consider whether it actually moves things forward. According to communication expert Stuart Fedderson, one particular question has become so automatic that most people never question it, even though it consistently leads conversations to a dead end. That question is the universally used “How are you?” and Fedderson argues it may be the most useless thing you can say to someone.
The problem with “How are you?” is not that it sounds rude or unfriendly but that it invites almost no real response. As Fedderson, whose advice was covered by the NY Post, explains, most people reach for this phrase not because they genuinely care about the answer but because they want to dissolve an awkward moment. The person on the receiving end almost always replies with a single word like “fine” or “good” and then bounces the same question right back. What follows is a brief exchange that reveals nothing, connects no one, and leaves both parties standing in the same silence they were trying to escape.
Fedderson describes “How are you?” as the go-to filler for people who have not thought about what they actually want to say. The question creates the illusion of engagement without delivering any of its substance. Both sides give one-word answers, neither person learns anything new about the other, and in most cases the conversation simply stops right there. For Fedderson, this makes it not just unhelpful but actively counterproductive, because it uses up the crucial opening moment of an interaction without building any real connection.
There is one exception worth noting. When two people share a close bond, “How are you?” can still carry genuine weight. A trusted friend or family member is far more likely to give an honest answer, to open up about what is actually going on in their life. But when the question is directed at a coworker you barely know, a new acquaintance, or someone you are hoping to impress, the result is almost always the same hollow exchange. Fedderson specifically points out that it is also a poor choice when trying to start a conversation with someone you are interested in romantically, whether in person or online.
The fix, according to Fedderson, is simply to be more intentional about how you open a conversation. Instead of defaulting to an empty reflex, ask something specific, something that gives the other person a real opportunity to respond with more than a single syllable. Noticing something around you, referencing a shared experience, or expressing genuine curiosity about something specific in that person’s life will always outperform the generic opener. The goal is not to impress anyone with a clever line but to invite a real exchange by showing that you are actually paying attention.
Understanding why certain conversational habits stick around can help put this all in perspective. Small talk, including phrases like “How are you?”, has deep cultural roots and serves important social functions as a signal of goodwill and acknowledgment. Linguists and sociologists refer to this kind of low-stakes verbal exchange as phatic communication, meaning its purpose is social bonding rather than information transfer. The issue arises when phatic phrases are used as a substitute for actual engagement rather than as a brief gateway into it. Research in communication studies consistently shows that people feel more satisfied after conversations that include specific, genuine questions rather than purely reflexive ones. The art of good conversation is largely about moving past the ritual opener as quickly as possible and into something that actually matters to both people involved.
If “How are you?” has been your default opener, it might be worth experimenting with more specific alternatives and seeing how differently conversations unfold. Share your thoughts in the comments.




